Raising Concrete Slabs: Alternative to Mudjacking
Choosing the right concrete lifting solution can be challenging for homeowners. Both polyurethane foam injection and mudjacking have their strengths, but which option is truly the best? This page explores the differences between mudjacking and polyurethane foam to help you make an informed decision.
What is Mudjacking?
Mudjacking, or slab jacking, is a traditional (and arguably outdated) way to raise sunken or uneven concrete slabs. The process begins by drilling small holes into the damaged concrete.
Then, technicians pump a mud slurry—a mixture of water, soil, cement, and sometimes additives like sand—through the holes beneath the slab. As the slurry flows under the concrete, it fills gaps and gradually lifts the sunken slab back to its original position.
Limitations of Mudjacking
Although mudjacking is cost-effective, it has limitations that become more costly in the long run. It is not ideal for heavy or load-bearing slabs (such as a driveway or patio), severely damaged concrete, or areas with weak soil.
The materials used in mudjacking also erode over time, especially in wet conditions, causing concrete to sink even after repairs. As such, mudjacking repairs typically last only 2-5 years providing only a temporary solution in most cases.
What is Polyurethane Foam Injection?
Polyurethane foam injection, also known as “polyurethane concrete lifting”, is a modern method used to raise and stabilize concrete slabs that have settled or sunk due to factors like deep soil erosion, poor compaction, or other underlying issues.
Technicians inject a two-part polyurethane foam beneath the settled concrete through small holes drilled into the surface. This high-density, expanding foam displaces air and compacts the soil below the slab.
Advantages of Polyurethane Foam
Polyurethane is becoming the industry standard for concrete repair because it provides a number of benefits. Not only does it last longer than mudjacking, but it’s also easier and quicker to install. Here are just a few of the advantages that come with this modern concrete lifting method:
- Shorter Cure Time: The foam used in foam jacking cures faster than the mud slurry used in mudjacking, resulting in minimal downtime.
- Higher Load-Bearing Capacity: The foam’s excellent compressive strength supports heavy loads, making foam jacking suitable for a wide range of applications, including industrial and commercial projects.
- Greater Durability and Longevity: Foam jacking repairs last much longer than mudjacking repairs—often providing a better long-term value. The polyurethane foam resists moisture, chemicals, and microbial growth, ensuring the repair’s integrity over time.
- More Environmentally Friendly: Once cured, the foam is non-toxic, inert, and does not break down over time, posing any threat to groundwater or soil quality—unlike some materials used in mudjacking.
- Expansion and Lifting: The foam expands to fill voids and lifts the concrete slab back to its original position with precise control.
- Stabilization: The foam also stabilizes the underlying soil, preventing further settlement or erosion and enhancing the repair’s longevity.
- Minimal Disruption: Foam jacking requires drilling only small holes (about the size of a penny), resulting in minimal disruption to the surrounding area and allowing for quick, efficient repairs.
- Immediate Use: Unlike mudjacking, foam jacking allows for almost immediate use of the repaired surface, as the foam quickly expands and lifts the slab.
How Mudjacking and Polyurethane Foam Handle Different Environments
Concrete repair techniques can vary greatly depending on the region. While mudjacking uses a heavy slurry to lift concrete, it often struggles in challenging environments like wet soil or areas prone to ground movement. Polyurethane foam, on the other hand, is lightweight, moisture-resistant, and more adaptable to different conditions, making it the preferred method in most regions.
To illustrate these differences, let’s compare how Southern California and Florida (two places where Groundworks lifts concrete) impact these repair methods. Both areas have warm climates, but they present unique challenges.
Southern California
Southern California’s dry weather and frequent earthquakes create specific issues for concrete stability:
- Dry Soil: During long droughts, soil can shrink, creating gaps under concrete. Polyurethane foam effectively fills these gaps and stabilizes the ground, while mudjacking’s heavy slurry can be too rigid and prone to cracking as soils dry.
- Earthquake Activity: Earthquakes cause ground movement, and the lightweight, flexible nature of polyurethane foam allows it to stabilize concrete without adding excessive weight. Mudjacking, however, may not hold up well in shifting soil conditions due to its density.
- Consistent Warm Temperatures: Polyurethane foam can be applied year-round in Southern California without concern for cold temperatures or frost, unlike mudjacking, which may require longer curing times in cooler conditions.
Florida
Florida’s tropical climate, heavy rains, and high water table present different challenges:
- Wet Soil: Frequent rain and a high water table can lead to erosion and washouts. Polyurethane foam resists moisture, making it ideal for these conditions. Mudjacking’s slurry, however, is susceptible to erosion in wet soils.
- Sinkholes: While neither method can fix sinkholes, polyurethane foam helps stabilize soil around them, preventing further settling of concrete. Mudjacking’s heavy slurry may not be effective in sandy, unstable soil conditions.
- Storms and Humidity: Florida’s frequent storms mean repairs must be carefully planned. Polyurethane foam’s quick curing time and moisture resistance make it more reliable in these conditions, while mudjacking may require longer drying times and is vulnerable to moisture intrusion.
The Bottom Line: Polyurethane vs. Mudjacking
Polyurethane foam is more versatile and effective across different regions, adapting well to dry, wet, and shifting soils. In contrast, mudjacking struggles in extreme conditions like high moisture or seismic areas, making polyurethane foam the better choice for long-lasting concrete repair.
Trust Groundworks for Your Concrete Lifting Needs
Whether it’s your pool deck, driveway, sidewalk, or porch, Groundworks has the solution for you. We use PolyRenewal™, a polyurethane injection system that provides a quick, effective, and durable method.
Reach out to the concrete lifting professionals at Groundworks and schedule a free inspection today.
FAQs
Protect your home’s concrete surfaces through sealing techniques, ensuring proper drainage to avoid erosion, evenly distributing weight, and regular inspection and maintenance.
Polyurethane foam injections employ a two-part foam mix that expands beneath the concrete, lifts the slab, and fills gaps. The rapid setting foam enables accessibility to the treated concrete areas sooner than other repair methods. PolyRenewal polyurethane foam is an efficient and cost-efficient alternative to complete slab replacement.
No, it is generally recommended to wait at least 24 to 48 hours before walking or driving on the concrete to allow the slurry to cure properly and ensure the slab is fully stabilized.
Related Resources
Ted Dryce
Disclaimer: “Concrete leveling” means the process by which cracked, uneven concrete is stabilized, and in many cases lifted, by means of PolyRenewal™ polyurethane foam. Groundworks does not guarantee that PolyRenewal™ can make your concrete perfectly level.